Musical Hair Critiquing Essay Example for Free

tuneful Hair Critiquing Essay1) What show are you critiquing?Hair2) Give a brief summary of the myth line.Claude Hooper Bukowski, an Oklahoma farm boy, heads to New York City to enter the Army and serve in the Vietnam War. In commutation Park, he meets a troupe of free-spirited hippies led by George Berger, a young man who introduces him to deb Sheila Franklin when they crash a dinner party at her home. Inevitably, Claude is sent off to recruit training in Nevada, but Berger and his band of merry pranksters follow him. Sheila flirts with an off-duty Sergeant in order to steal his uniform, which she gives to Berger. He uses it to attract Claude from the base for a last meeting with Sheila, taking his place, but while Claude is away, the unit flies come forward to Vietnam, taking Berger with them. The shoot ends with the main cast singing at Bergers grave, followed by scenes of a large anti-war remonstrance outside the White House in Washington, DC.3) What did you like best about this show?Hair succeeds at all levelsas lowdown fun, as affecting drama, as exhilarating spectacle and as provocative social observation. It achieves its goals by rigorously heeding the rules of classic American musical comedy dialogue, plot, song and dance blend seamlessly to create a juggernaut of excitement.4) What did you like least about this show?The film omits the songs The Bed, Dead End, Oh Great God of Power, I Believe in Love, Going Down, Air, My Conviction, Abie Baby, Frank Mills, and What a Piece of Work is Man from the musical. Many of the songs look at been shortened, sped up, rearranged, or assigned to different characters to allow for the differences in plot.5) Who was the hero/heroine?Claude Hooper Bukowski/ Sheila Franklin.6) Who was the villain?The General.7) Were you able to understand everything? If non what did you understand?A major plot difference between the film and the musical involves a fall away that leads Berger to go to Vietnam in Claudes pla ce, where he is killed. The musical focuses on the U.S. peace movement, as well as the whap relationships among the Tribe members, while the film focuses on the carefree antics of the hippies. But why not make the film ending a happy one? In that case, the movie will better reflect the conniption of American Culture Happy Ever After.8) Did you get a chance to listen to the soundtrack?Unfortunately not.9) What was your darling song?Aquarius.10) Did you think that the actors were well cast?Sure. The cast featured John Savage as Claude Hooper Bukowski, finesse Williams as George Berger and Beverly DAngelo as Sheila Franklin. Williams was nominated for New Star of the Year in a Motion photograph Male.11) If you were to remake this show who would you cast in the title roles? Why?If I were to remake the show, I would sill fill the actor and actress as the hero and heroine. The actors are really good-looking, and they can sing and dance well.12) What aspect of American Culture do yo u see in this show? Nothing ventured nothing gained. Berger is not only at the heart of the hippie Tribe but is assigned some of Claudes conflict involving whether or not to obey the draft. His death led to the large anti-war protest and featured the carefree antics of the hippies.